Peugeot 107 Fuel Economy Comparison Surprises Drivers
Peugeot 107 fuel economy vs rivals: clear winner?
The Peugeot 107 is not the single best city car for fuel economy, but it remains one of the strongest real-world bargain choices in the A-segment, especially if you find a manual 1.0-litre example in good condition. Official figures put the 107 at around 4.3 to 4.6 L/100 km combined, while real-world reports are usually closer to 5.5 to 6.3 L/100 km, which means it is efficient rather than class-leading once urban traffic, cold starts, and short trips are factored in.
Why the 107 still matters
The urban benchmark for the Peugeot 107 came from a simple formula: light weight, a tiny three-cylinder petrol engine, and short gearing that kept costs down in the city. The car's 1.0-litre version produced 68 hp and was officially rated at 4.3 L/100 km combined in one published specification, with a manual transmission generally returning the best economy.
In practical terms, that means the 107 was designed to sip fuel on congested streets, not to dominate modern efficiency charts on paper. Several real-world sources show city consumption that is noticeably higher than the brochure number, with one dataset suggesting about 5.5 l/100 km and another reporting 9.3 l/100 km in urban use, which is a reminder that stop-start driving can quickly erode small-car efficiency claims.
Official vs real-world use
The biggest reason the fuel economy gap matters is that buyers compare official numbers with actual weekly driving costs, and those numbers are rarely identical. For the Peugeot 107, the official combined figure sits roughly in the mid-4s L/100 km, while multiple user-based datasets suggest average real-world combined use closer to the low-to-mid 6s L/100 km, or roughly 18% to 20% higher than stated.
That spread is not unusual for older petrol city cars, but it does change the verdict. If you drive mostly short city hops, the Peugeot 107 is efficient enough to be economical; if you want the lowest possible fuel bill in 2026-style traffic, newer hybrids now have a clearer advantage.
Comparison table
The table below compares the Peugeot 107 with nearby city-car rivals and a few modern efficiency leaders using the published figures available in the cited sources. The numbers are a mix of official and real-world values, so they are best used for relative comparison rather than exact shopping advice.
| Model | Fuel type | Official combined | Typical real-world use | City notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot 107 1.0 | Petrol | About 4.3 to 4.6 L/100 km | About 5.5 to 6.3 L/100 km | Very good for short urban runs, but traffic pushes consumption up |
| Toyota Yaris Hybrid | Hybrid | Up to 70.6 mpg UK cited in 2026 small-car listings | Often around 55 to 65 mpg in real use | Usually stronger in city traffic than the 107 because of electrified low-speed driving |
| Toyota Prius | Hybrid | Top-ranked in 2026 gas-mileage listings | Typically class-leading among non-EVs | Not a pure city car, but far more efficient overall than older petrol hatchbacks |
| Renault Clio | Petrol/Hybrid depending on version | About 65.7 mpg cited among economical small cars | Varies by powertrain | Modern efficient versions can outperform the 107 comfortably |
| Honda Jazz | Hybrid | About 62.8 mpg cited among economical small cars | Strong in stop-start driving | Often better for urban efficiency than older non-hybrid city cars |
What the numbers mean
The Peugeot 107 wins on simplicity, not on outright efficiency supremacy. In a straight comparison with older rivals from the same era, it is absolutely competitive, and its modest engine output plus low weight make it easy to drive cheaply, especially on open roads and in mixed use.
Against modern small hybrids, though, the 107 loses ground because hybrid systems recover energy in stop-start traffic and reduce the penalty of idling, acceleration, and braking. That is why current economical small-car lists place hybrid models such as the Toyota Yaris and Honda Jazz ahead of older petrol-only city cars in efficiency rankings.
Real-world ownership factors
The fuel tank and trip range are also part of the story, because efficiency is only useful if the car can stretch a tank through a week of commuting. Published specifications cite a 35-litre tank for the Peugeot 107, which helps it cover a respectable distance between fill-ups even if urban use drags consumption above the brochure claim.
Transmission choice matters as well. Sources describing the 107's manual versions show slightly better economy than the automated 2-Tronic variant, while the automatic can be notably less efficient in real use, which is typical for early-2000s city cars with robotized gearboxes.
Where it ranks in the class
The city-car class has changed a lot since the Peugeot 107 first appeared, and that changes how we judge it today. In its own period, the 107 was a very credible economy car, with official figures around the low-4s L/100 km and a low curb weight that helped it look and feel frugal.
By 2026 standards, however, the best fuel-sippers in the small-car market are mostly hybrids or newer downsized engines with more advanced efficiency tech. That means the 107 is no longer the clear winner overall, but it can still be a smart used buy if your priority is inexpensive city mobility rather than headline mpg leadership.
Buying advice
If your goal is maximum efficiency, the best-used Peugeot 107 is usually a manual 1.0-litre car with a documented service history and healthy tires, because neglected maintenance can easily erase the car's inherent fuel-saving advantage. A clean example driven gently in urban and suburban conditions should still return respectable economy, while a tired or heavily city-abused car may drift toward the worse end of the real-world range.
- Choose the manual gearbox if fuel economy is the top priority.
- Expect real-world consumption to be higher than the brochure figure, especially in congested traffic.
- Compare against hybrids if you care about today's best-in-class economy, not just old-school simplicity.
Bottom line
The Peugeot 107 is a good fuel saver, but not an unchallenged champion. It was one of the more economical petrol city cars of its era, yet modern hybrid rivals now beat it on both official and real-world efficiency, especially in stop-start city driving.
For used-car shoppers, the 107 still makes sense because it combines low running costs, simple mechanics, and decent economy in a package that is cheap to buy and easy to live with. For buyers focused purely on fuel economy in 2026, the clearer winner is usually a hybrid small car rather than the Peugeot 107.
FAQs
Everything you need to know about Peugeot 107 Fuel Economy Comparison Surprises Drivers
Is the Peugeot 107 good on fuel?
Yes, the Peugeot 107 is good on fuel by petrol city-car standards, with official combined figures around 4.3 to 4.6 L/100 km and real-world results commonly around 5.5 to 6.3 L/100 km.
Is the Peugeot 107 better than the Toyota Yaris Hybrid?
No, the Toyota Yaris Hybrid is usually better for fuel economy, especially in city traffic, because modern hybrid systems reduce fuel use during low-speed stop-start driving.
Why is real-world fuel economy worse than official figures?
Real-world fuel economy is worse because official tests are done under controlled conditions, while daily driving includes traffic, cold starts, hills, short trips, and more aggressive acceleration.
Which Peugeot 107 version is most efficient?
The manual 1.0-litre petrol version is generally the best choice for efficiency, while the automated 2-Tronic version tends to be less economical in everyday use.